Some items for your pre-weekend perusal:
- We’re sitting on the sidelines in Montreal, as Bill Clinton pointed out today. The administration’s response? This sort of stuff is great! Because they “are useful opportunities to hear a wide range of views on global climate change.”
This calls to mind a terrific article written by my pal and “Wait Wait” fellow traveler Charlie Pierce in last month’s Esquire, “Greetings from Idiot America.” It’s an incredibly good read, and it accurately characterizes our current trend of keeping a “healthy debate” going about established facts. Remember - our kids should be taught both sides of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics debate, so that they can make an informed decision about whether or not the Energy Fairy exists.
[I advocate reading the article in print form or paying the online fee. Scurrilous, snazzy-layout-hating types might be tempted to skip the 5 buck monthly subscription fee and read the text of the article elsewhere on the web by Googling, I dunno - “charles pierce idiot america” or something. That is their choice, and I can’t stop them.]
————
Another friend, Rob Paravonian, is here with me right now, visiting LA and lamenting the weather that prevents him from wearing his new parka.
You might remember Rob from the days when this site had a nice long list of my friends’ sites on the right-hand side. Those days will return soon, I promise. For now… Rob’s been blogging a lot more in recent months, and his site (and store! Get “Living it Down!”) can be hours of fun.
You may particularly enjoy the pictures and descriptions of Rob’s recent trip to entertain our troops in Afghanistan. This post-tour post is one of my favorites.
————
Finally, it’s time for my second, apparently bi-annual pledge drive. (Or is that “semi-annual?” Twice a year, anyway. Don’t bother telling me, I’ll never believe you.)
Yes, the recent bills for this site are adding up. A little. As many of you know, I have no aspirations to make a living off this blog. And the Comments section alone make it worthwhile for me to keep it going. So I’m only looking to break even, really (though I wouldn’t turn down sizable donations and golf trips to England and whatnot… corrupt powerbrokers are welcome here!).
So, if you have the impulse and wherewithal to click that li’l PayPal button to the right and make a small contribution to the site, why, that’d be just great. But honestly, I don’t need much. According to my calculations, something like 10 to 20 bucks from 1-2% of my daily readership would do the trick nicely. Anything significantly more than that will be promptly embezzled, and that is my proimise to you, the American people.
[This may be one of the wimpiest, most mealy-mouthed pledge drives on record. Someone ought to research that - I may be eligible for a grant.]





34 comments
Murray
December 9, 2005 at 6:58 pm
1That’s the problem with you NPR types. Always with the fund drive. I just hope those Pay Pal folks don’t screw up the $10,000 I’m going to send you this time the way they did last time.
Global warming is just like ID, all the Right has to do is muddy the water to win. If 99.9% of scientists say it’s real and that we are the cause of Global Warming, then any argument or reporting has to give equal time to each side. Balanced and completely unfair.
dee
December 9, 2005 at 7:38 pm
2I donate $100,000 anonymously!!!
Susie
December 9, 2005 at 7:46 pm
3I’m all for people sending you money. But personally, I think you should consider ads. Hell I even bought an text ad this year for mom, for one week on dooce.
blogads baby. Do it.
David
December 9, 2005 at 7:48 pm
4Except that global warming is proof that the IDer neglected to include the I-part when setting in motion the chain of events that eventually resulted in the minds of energy/transportation CEOs, ascendent contemporary Republican leaders, and the Chinese capitalists, along with oh, you name ‘em.
Adam, the mail’s in the check, you lame-assed fundraiser, you.
David
December 9, 2005 at 7:53 pm
5NO ADS ON FA (I’m already working on placards and tee shirts). Ads are ok on most of the websites I depend on, but not on FA. It is so pristine, such an intellectual freedom zone, that even the thought of ads is anathema.
cooper
December 9, 2005 at 8:06 pm
6While we’re talking money, I heard on MarketPlace on the way home today about this poor schmuck in Japan that offered a trade yesterday of 645,000 shares of his company for 1 yen, instead of 1 share of the stock for the current market price of 645,000 yen. It cost his company over $200,000,000 and wiped out their profit for the entire year.
So sorry, no bonus for you, Hideo!
Susie
December 9, 2005 at 8:38 pm
7I vote ads. Twice.
BTW, how much do I have to pledge to get an FA tote bag, mug or Fanny the Roborat DVD collection?
cooper
December 9, 2005 at 11:03 pm
8Well, I read the article by Charlie Pierce and I must say, not bad for a sportswriter.
Charlie P.
December 9, 2005 at 11:51 pm
9I don’t think it’s right to Google for a free copy of Mr. Pierce’s article rather than paying for it through proper channels. Mr. Pierce is quite talented (as cooper rightly pointed out), and his writing is worth every penny and then some. Next thing you know, people will expect to get their music and movies for free off of this here Internet.
Oh, and as for donating money to help keep this blog going, I have it on good word that Adam is the sole heir to a fortune earned from the paperclip patent. He even uses paperclips to organize and manage the heaps of cash he carries with him wherever he goes. And his day-to-day routes are pretty much set in stone and entirely predictable.
Bob
December 10, 2005 at 12:34 am
10I was going to say that Charlie Pierce’s article is terrific, a compelling indictment of most everything dumb and disheartening in America today. But then I’d have to admit that I Googled for a free copy. Which is bad. So I won’t.
One point to add to the article that I did not Google, damn it: not all of the folks who embrace questionable or non-existent science are untrained in the sciences. I’m an engineer, and I know of other engineers who do not, for example, believe that humans are influencing global warming. Why? Here’s my guess: if we are creating, or accelerating, global warming, we’d have to change our ways. And that would be massively inconvenient, in direct contradiction to our Constitution’s Freedom From Inconvenience clause. We’d have to drive tiny, underpowered cars or, God forbid, ride the bus. Faced with choices like those, an engineer can rationalize rings around a layman.
madbard
December 10, 2005 at 1:22 am
11Shame on you, Adam. Clearly you are impersonating your family and colleagues and posting in their names. In fact, this message is being posted by Adam as well. I have no shame.
David
December 10, 2005 at 3:17 am
12Bob,
You definitely have a point.
College biology instructors are educated persons of science, right? Well, maybe. One of my colleagues, a biology instructor, not only rejected evolution, he was very much opposed to the showing of The Last Temptation of Christ. Belief systems can be frighteningly powerful sources of tyranny over the human mind, even an educated one.
Engineers are also all too often plagued with arrogance, viewing whatever they happen to think as empirical gospel, rather like those doctors who rejected antiseptic considerations when delivering babies (apologies up front to the engineers who don’t fall into this hubristic trap - Bob, you’re closer to the group and can likely place this generalization in better perspective).
Jon
December 10, 2005 at 9:44 am
13Semiannually is how often you ask; biannually is how often I think about it.
littlebit
December 11, 2005 at 8:20 am
14Susie,
You know dooce? Are you a Utah girl or are you just as captivated as I am by the new verb for getting fired over blogging one’s opinion about one’s workplace–”dooced”?
I was proud of her for being frank about the usefulness of a little cash for her site and for her life.
As I am of Adam. PayPal anon.
littlebit
December 11, 2005 at 8:28 am
15Oh. Susie, sister, mom. That Susie. Hi. sorry about the Utah allusion. dooce’s popularity must be bigger than I realized.
Hellen Keller
December 11, 2005 at 3:50 pm
16Some times when I type I get one one letter to the left or right. Tell me if that happens here, plau?
Hellen Keller
December 11, 2005 at 6:29 pm
17Um, Helen…
Pete IVDL
December 11, 2005 at 6:59 pm
18As an out-of-work engineer/wannabe hedonist, I currently have the freedom to believe anything I choose; unfortunately, this means I don’t have the wherewithal to fund everything I choose. However, I do choose Adam’s Running Away From Home charity… only please, please never, ever, EVER EVER use advertising to insult and inform (and possibly raise filthy lucre). Let’s keep FA poor but incredibly dignified!
I also forked out for the KeepMedia subscription - once I found the magazines it kept articles from, I couldn’t resist! Now I get to read “National Hog Farmer”, “The Corn and Soybean Digest”, and even “Refrigerated Transport”… ohhh, baby, yeahhhhh… And I might even get time to look at some of the others.
Coop, the Tokyo trade in question was a “finger fault” : instead of selling 1 share at 625000 yen, the poor schmuck entered 625000 shares at 1 yen. There were a whole bunch of questions about how the computer checking system could fail to flag this as a dodgy transaction, how someone could confuse “enter number of shares to sell” with “enter price per share”, and much more. Plus, the company lost one quarter’s profit, not really a whole year’s profit. But I still wouldn’t want to be the dude who did it! He’d be in more trouble than someone incorporating a certain lady commenter in his ongoing “Whodunnit”…
dee
December 11, 2005 at 7:20 pm
19I heartily endorse the no-ad alternative, simply because I don’t want to be subjected to the ads for products that would appeal to THIS group.
cooper
December 11, 2005 at 7:58 pm
20Hey, ain’t it great to see Bill Clinton in the fray again? He has his foibles, for sure, but he does have a clue about environmental consequences. I’d like to see Bill and Bush go toe to toe on Global Warming. Clinton wins with a KO in the first ten seconds of round one.
Pete, if that’s the case, I think our pal, Hideo, best fall on his sword - ASAP.
dee, good point. Like Groucho used to say, “I certainly wouldn’t want to join any organization that would be willing to have me as a member.” Well, sort of like that, maybe.
I agree with the anti-ad coalition. Anyone feeling the same has to pony up.
Tom in Santa Clara
December 11, 2005 at 8:17 pm
21Kudos to Adam for mentioning Charlie’s piece, it is incredibly well written, pointed, accurate, all those things that news used to be!
And it comes from a sports guy?
ice weasel
December 11, 2005 at 11:13 pm
22I guess I should confess, back in the middle of October, when Mr. Pierce’s came out, I quoted some lengthy pieces of it on my blog. I won’t link to it. It’s well worth the $2.95 Esquire charges. It’s brilliant.
As for ads, I would personally prefer not to see them. However, I fully support your right to shit up your bog as you wish Adam and frankly, if there is some revenue for you in it, you deserve it. Ads are nothing unusual and while I am not adverse to dropping a nickel or two in the hat I walk by, you put work into what you post here, you should get something for it.
Anyway, it was a sad weekend for a number of reasons. One public thing, I think with the publication of Viveca Novak’s mewling mea cupla we can now officially pronounce the United States press corp as dead. Sure, there is some life here and there. But the stuff that 98% of America sees it incomplete at very best and crap more typically.
And in the spirit of trying to not end this post on a down note, look for some a few nickels from me soon Adam.
Thanks.
ice weasel
December 11, 2005 at 11:17 pm
23Oh, and one more thing, is Chris Wallace perhaps the lowest form of life to have a contract for airtime on the planet? I mean, the guy rammed his own father into the ground for fuck’s sake.
ginny
December 11, 2005 at 11:39 pm
24My husband and I will be seeing Mr. Pierce this Thursday at the Chase (what? Chase who?) Auditorium. I’m thinking of just handing over the $2.95 if I run into him in the hallway so I can link to his (mumble mumble)excellent and hard-hitting (mumble) guilt free on my blog. I cannot confirm or deny that Google was involved.
I hope he has change for a fiver.
Melina
December 12, 2005 at 3:37 am
25I jumped the gun with the annual pledge drive as you know. I, too, am in the “no ads” group. No On Ads Adam/NOAA! Oh, that’d get confused with the other NOAA. Nevermind.
I have no problem PayPal-ing it for blogs that are actually worth supporting, Well, that and your retirement fund as well…haha.
Daino
December 12, 2005 at 7:24 am
26I’m reading from Thailand, so I assum 10 - 20 is cool?
Mary
December 12, 2005 at 10:55 am
27RE: the Global Warming/ID debate…..As any coder can tell you, it was Designed Intelligently. The mess up is user error.
Any way to pay not using PayPal? I, too, vote “no ads”.
Sue
December 12, 2005 at 1:27 pm
28Adam,
I’m with Mary - I remember reading of various folks’ difficulties with PayPal the last time you had a pledge drive. Is it worth the additional expense to, say, rent a post office box or something equally old-fashioned?
Hope everyone here is aware that Charlie Pierce is also featured weekly on Only a Game on NPR with Bill Littlefield. In our market, it’s on Saturday mornings from 7-8. Most entertaining.
Thanks, Adam, and keep up the good work.
Please.
Deno
December 12, 2005 at 4:55 pm
29Google? What’s that?
(cough)
Ann
December 12, 2005 at 7:08 pm
30I hate PayPal, but I too am willing–nay, eager–to contribute. Perhaps a tip jar at the upcoming Felberpalooza?
Murray
December 12, 2005 at 9:50 pm
31A Felberpalooza fundraiser at Grouseland! Good enough. Get your plane tickets ready for Labor Day. I’ll pick up everyone at BWI and we’ll have a great time. (Free Maker’s Mark!) Now we just have to get Adam out here.
Pete IVDL
December 13, 2005 at 8:44 pm
32Murray, free Maker’s Mark and you’re wondering how to get Adam to Grouseland? Come onnnn! That whooshing sound you can hear? That’s Adam on his way…
Thompson
December 14, 2005 at 4:10 pm
33Actually, Pete, that whooshing noise would be me in an Adam Felber mask in the off-chance that the Maker’s Mark is held in reserve…
Er…
I mean, of course it’s Adam. Must be Adam. Looks just like him. He’s just not moving his mouth when he talks because… um… because he’s been learning ventriloquism. He’s up to the first lesson–throwing your voice to your own lips.
help quit smoking
April 10, 2006 at 7:17 pm
34I would have to say if that were my situation I would also agree, but it is not my current situation. The last post leading up to this one would be the same answer in my humble opinion. Great site and keep the nice content coming