You’re probably familiar with the Whos of Dr. Seuss. Little, tiny, architecturally-challenged humanoids, frequently sporting seemingly vestigial antennae. Their two major literary appearances, in “Horton Hears a Who” and “How the Grinch Stole Christmas” are somewhat problematic: They’re about the size of amoebae in “Horton,” with their whole world situated on a speck of dust, yet there’s no indication of this relative size in “The Grinch.” Given the earlier evidence, though, one has to conclude that the Grinch himself is also nearly unicellular, which makes him a slightly less imposing firgure.
But that’s not important right now. What’s important about the Whos is that they’re masters of collective action. Fun-loving, perhaps a bit righteous, but when the chips are down the Whos pull together and either yell or sing, usually to great effect. They manage to save their world, or melt a tyrant’s heart, and they do so just by the force of their convictions and indominable spirit.
Frankly, I always found the Whos a little smug.
Even as a child, I was aware that these little goody-goodies were insufficiently prepared for crisis, and it didn’t surprise me that a single villian could rob their entire city in an evening or that their whole planet could be sent spiraling towards its doom so easily. Anyone who ignored the larger world until they were dangling over a vat of boiling beezlenut oil… well, toddler Adam wouldn’t have felt too bad if those heedless little bastards turned out to find themselves deep-fried one fine evening. Would’ve served ‘em right, cute though they were.
But I’m thinking about the Whos today, because of this story, “Americans Take Local Road to Kyoto”:
MONTREAL (Reuters) - While U.S. President George W. Bush refuses to accept the Kyoto Protocol to cut greenhouse gas emissions, at least 40 million Americans will find themselves bound to the international treaty to curb global warming.
“Since the protocol took effect last February, Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels has convinced 192 cities to agree to cut emissions 7 percent from 1990 levels by 2012 — the recommended target for the United States, which emits 25 percent of the world’s heat-trapping gases.
The cities join an increasing number of states, including California and New York, and leading corporations choosing to follow the Kyoto lead even while their country doesn’t.
They can act by using renewable energy and alternative fuels, placing tougher controls on auto emissions or building energy-saving green buildings.
“We reject the idea that is put forward by our national leaders in the United States that we have a choice to save the environment or save the economy,” Nickels said on Tuesday on the sidelines of the 189-nation United Nations conference on climate change.
Bush pulled the United States out of Kyoto in 2001, arguing that the mandatory emissions cuts for some 40 industrial nations would hurt U.S. growth and wrongly excluded developing economies like China and India.
And since then his administration has shown no sign of budging on accepting mandatory curbs, to the frustration of European leaders and environmental activists huddling in Montreal.
[Jerome] Ringo said mayors, governors and congressmen are “filling the leadership vacuum left by the Bush administration…”
“We are all part of the solution on climate change. The governor recognizes that, while California is only a piece of that, leadership is important and we can play that role,” Alan Lloyd, California’s secretary for the environment, said….
“It is inevitable that after the cities and states show it is safe, the politicians in Washington, D.C. will join and again the United States will take its moral responsibility,” [Mayor Nickels] said.
The analogy is pretty clear. Just as in the war with Osama bin Wickersham and his brothers, the American people have woken up to their impending doom and decided to do something. And as with Christmasgate, the out-of-touch President Grinch is going to have to learn about the Whos’ real values from a lofty, lonely mountain perch.
Though I expect the ending will be slightly different, even if we do manage to save this benighted dust speck:
And the Grinch, with his grinch-feet ice-cold in the snow,
Stood puzzling and puzzling: “How could it be so?
“It came without Hummers! It came without oil!
“It came without burblers, chugglers, or smoglers a-boil!”
And he puzzled three hours, `till his puzzler was sore.
Then the Grinch thought of something he hadn’t before!
“Maybe,” he thought, “This is all due to me.
“Maybe, just maybe, it’s MY policy.
“Why, I secretly meant this, though I never said it.
“If the planet is saved, then give ME the credit!
“I forbled the taxes and kruptizzled the budget
“Why, I LOVE the world and NEVER would smudge it.
“It’s just like I say when I am electored
“The good in this world is ALL private-sectored!
“Yes, that’s it. That’s right, this is all what I meant
“I meant it, I meant it, I meant meant meant meant!”
And so the Grinch went on, unreconstructed,
And claimed he saved Earth, though really he’d fucked it.
And the Whos, well, some cheered, and other Whos seethed.
But every last Who threw their heads back and breathed.
And breathing’s the point, not who rescued who,
Breathing, it’s true, is what all the Whos do.
The irrascible Toddler Adam would’ve told you that the Whos deserved to choke on fumes, and wouldn’t have cared if the Grinch forced them to suck on a tailpipe. But I’m older now, and paradoxically more open to a good holiday story.





42 comments
Pete IVDL
December 7, 2005 at 5:58 pm
1Ain’t that a peach?
Someone in the white house needs to tell ol’ GOTUS that this proves that some thinking people actually don’t give a damn what he says, no matter how many times he saysifies it. (Otherwise, they’ll be ignoring their white house “No president left behind” policy).
What an earthwarming story.
Mr. Mint
December 7, 2005 at 6:06 pm
2“Kruptizzled!”
I love it!
I doubt Greenspan’s ever dared to use that particular adjective in a Fed meeting and yet it perfectly describes not only Mr. Grinch’s budget but also our current economy.
Adam, I had no idea that in addition to an amazing comedic wit, you also possessed a world-class understanding of economics.
Jon
December 7, 2005 at 6:27 pm
3“Unreconstructed” rhymed with “fucked it” is Pure Genius. Seuss would be proud. Sort of.
Harold
December 7, 2005 at 6:31 pm
4Damn, that’s just Wubbulous!
Too bad the Federal government is putting its foot down and declaring that no states have the right to set their own vehicle emissions standards except California, and maybe not even them.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5028946
Harold
December 7, 2005 at 6:55 pm
5This article is more explicit about the fight against states adopting California emissions standards:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5033876
Chuggo
December 7, 2005 at 7:07 pm
6Adam,
I usually just read and grin, but I have to take this opportunity to thank you for giving the Whos their dues. Great job.
Mike Z
December 7, 2005 at 7:08 pm
7Excellent post, Adam.
Children can be ever so wise in their own way. Don’t be so quick to dismiss your toddlerian insights, which seem to point to something like “you get what you pay for.”
elendil
December 7, 2005 at 10:41 pm
8environmental activists huddling in Montreal
I am disappointed that this article makes only an oblique reference to the true tragedy of this story, that the poor misguided activists of Montreal have to resort to huddling together for warmth because they have no fossil fuels. Is this what we want for America? This is what happens when you commit yourself to the Kyoto protocol. With only sustainable energy sources for heat, Canadians have been plunged into the stone ages. Mark my words, it can happen here to.
So say no, no to Kyoto! Americans will not denigrate themselves by cuddling like Canadians. We need our fossil fuels.
David
December 7, 2005 at 10:58 pm
9Tongue-in-cheek post #8 aside, this one is good, really good.
Pretty cool incorporating “fuck it” in making the point in a wonderfully playful way that ultimately we simply cannot say “fuck it.”
Thank you, Adam.
cooper
December 7, 2005 at 11:33 pm
10Adam, great poem. You’ve got to save that one for the kids and make it family holiday tradition, well maybe change one or two words.
cooper
December 7, 2005 at 11:44 pm
11Chapter 23
Back in the Saddle
The “Rolling Tail” was the most effective tracking maneuver, requiring 4 – 6 agents, depending on the requirements of the stakeout. Agent Basher had one of his best agents - code-named “English Ivy” – well positioned, just down the sidewalk from the entrance to the three-story brownstone on K Street. Basher worried that she might have come back too soon after the operation, but the limp actually helped to sell the agent as a down and out bag lady. She wouldn’t be able to run down the target, but Basher knew she craved the action after two weeks flat on her back and 12 weeks of rehab. Besides, she was the smartest of the lot and he had missed her rapier-like wit and intuition. It was good to have her back, even at only 70%. Also on the team were the cab driver, parked, with engine running two blocks down; the bike messenger; the postal worker coming up the other side of the street; and the agent on the rooftop with the 500 mm telephoto lens. And not to forget the GOES satellite 240 miles up, supposedly decommissioned and scheduled to be splashed down in the Pacific, but actually a NSA eye in the sky, its camera positioned on the façade of the brownstone. This building was the headquarters of Jack Abramoff and Michael Scanlon and you’d think anyone with a brain would steer clear of it, but Basher knew that DC was also the capital of greed and hubris and he never ceased to be amazed.
The target paused, looked both ways as he left the building and began walking towards Agent Ivy. The bag lady’s shopping cart dropped 2 wheels off the curb and turned over as the target approached. As she gimped around to pick the mess, she jammed what looked like a thumbnail size ball of lint (actually a GPS/radio transponder – you’ve got to love nano-technology) into an outside pocket of the target’s overcoat.
“She’s still got her touch”, thought Basher. “Okay, let’s see where this takes us.”
To be continued…
elendil
December 7, 2005 at 11:44 pm
12Aw David, you didn’t like my cuddling Canadians?
I also thought it was a great post, Adam. I only discovered this blog a little while ago, and I’m glad I did.
Pete IVDL
December 7, 2005 at 11:54 pm
13Coop, are you going to get a one-legged lady kickin’ you up the butt or WHAT?
Congratulations, mate, I’m about to head into the kitchen to try and clean my keyboard and get rid of the coffee and snot. I’ve also had to wipe down the screen… I got halfway through before I realised who you were talkin’ about, and by then my buccal/nasal cavities were loaded and primed… Excellent.
I can’t wait till “English Ivy” reads that. You are sooooo targeted for “splashdown”…
cooper
December 8, 2005 at 12:03 am
14Pete, I just thought she’d enjoy a “Welcome Back!” story; should be any day now… Besides, she’s Left Coast, I’m east coast and even at my advanced age, I’ll be able to out-run her for quite a while yet.
Bob
December 8, 2005 at 12:48 am
15And so the Grinch went on, unreconstructed,
And claimed he saved Earth, though really he’d fucked it.
I hate it when people crib from TS Eliot without attribution.
Linkmeister
December 8, 2005 at 3:10 am
16Can we tie some antlers onto Cheney or Rove?
dee
December 8, 2005 at 9:50 am
17I think this ranks right up there with Bushnet.
Brilliant, Adam.
lilyfern
December 8, 2005 at 10:30 am
18While we’re (sorta) on the subject of Christmas:
Does anyone know the source of the poll referenced in the oft-mentioned phrase “While a recent poll reveals that ninety-six percent of Americans celebrate Christmas…” I’ve googled it and get over 500 hits, but it’s just over 500 people mindlessly quoting it as gospel. I’d love to see this actual “poll” which I suspect has questions like “Does your employer close on December 25?” (ergo, you celebrate Christmas.)
Mary
December 8, 2005 at 10:53 am
19lilyfern - I’ll bet the poll only asked if one celebrated Christmas. Not if you were Christian or believed in it. To quote a Hindu friend, “Any holiday that includes colored lights and giving your friends food, is a good holiday.” ;-D
That aside, big huzzahs to Adam and cooper for some great writing.
Tom
December 8, 2005 at 1:10 pm
20Awesome. Love the song.
Tom
December 8, 2005 at 1:11 pm
21And by “song”, I mean “ending”.
ice weasel
December 8, 2005 at 3:09 pm
22Great piece Adam. Funny isn’t it, how lucid bush sounds when filtered through Seuss-speak. Odd that.
And yes, as David said above, brilliant working “fuck” into it.
Ah, I just love cursing.
And Dee, thanks for the link. Speaking as someone relatively new here, I’ve really enjoyed the two recent links to older material.
Yes, I’m way too fat and lazy to go back systematically through the archives.
And thanks for the continuing intrigue Coop.
Jim
December 8, 2005 at 5:27 pm
23Great post..
and speaking of a vital organ that is “two sizes too small,” check out this breaking story from cnn:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/12/08/coulter.row.ap/index.html
“I love to engage in repartee with people who are stupider than I am,” Coulter told the crowd of 2,600 (at U of Conneticut) Wednesday.
Do you think she pronounced it ree-pert-teee?
If anyone can provide a link to a transcript of the question and answer session that was supposed to follow, please post.
Bob
December 8, 2005 at 6:10 pm
24“I love to engage in repartee with people who are stupider than I am,” Coulter told the crowd of 2,600 (at U of Connecticut) Wednesday.
Sure she does. It’s not like it happens all that often.
ice weasel
December 8, 2005 at 6:16 pm
25Transcript of Ann Coulter Q&A from UConn
Q: Ann, why do you think all these people are booing and jeering you?
coulter: Shut up you fucking traitor! Die!
Q: Ann, I read you book, “15 Ways to Cook a Liberal” and was wondering if you prefer hickory smoked barbecue sauce or something else more exotic?
coulter: Sweet fucking jesus, what kind of commie pussy are you? Exotic barbecue sauce? I’m going to get your infidel ass deported.
Q: Ann, if george w. bush isn’t the greatest American of all-time, who is?
coulter: What are you some islamo-fascist out to kill christmas and besmirch the holy reputation of the greatest human of all time? Get this idiot out of my face. And by the way, where are all the stupider people? These morons are giving me a headache.
wash, rinse, repeat…
Jim
December 8, 2005 at 7:10 pm
26Bob,
Thanks for the correction of the spelling of Connecticut in my original post.
Yo web mistress….is there any way to get a spell check feature for the comments section?
Ice Weasel,
Thanks for the transcript. I’m sure the actual session came pretty close to your speculation.
Ms. Coulter’s comment would have been more aptly directed to paramecium-laden petri dish.
tess
December 8, 2005 at 7:27 pm
27That has to be one of the greatest Suess poems ever. How did you ever uncover this little gem, Adam?
Murray
December 8, 2005 at 8:21 pm
28This is just absurd! Why shouldn’t I vote for a patriot who wants to protect our way of live, so that someone who is already too rich can get way richer. Besides who cares about global warming, Bill O Reilly says it aint so. America is the land of the free and we should all be free to make as much money as we can. Besides I won’t be around when the worst happens, and besides by the time my kids start to drown Jesus will return. Besides Govmint’s too big and should be off our backs, besides why shouldn’t I drive my Expodition to get groceries, you should see them liberals in there hybrids scatter when I come at em. Yeeee, Haw!
Mr_Blog
December 8, 2005 at 8:43 pm
29Not Greg Nickels! Here in Seattle we have a love-hate relationship with him. You can’t find many people saying nice things about him, but we just reelected him in a landslide.
As for his promotion of Kyoto, the goal is of course a good thing. However, you have to notice that the objective criterion is reducing emissions by participating CITIES. An easy way to partially meet the goal is for a city to shift some of the emissions somewhere else, I recently wrote about one such case here.
It’s like moving greenhouse gases to another set of books. Tricky.
SeattleDan
December 8, 2005 at 8:51 pm
30Yeah, I’m not nuts about Nickels either,but I keep voting for him. And the Kyoto promotion is a good thing.
cooper
December 8, 2005 at 9:46 pm
31dee, hast thou too much tyme upon thine hands, that thou wouldst rummage through bye-gone archives three years past?
“Bushlet” is great; thanks, Adam. Excellent work and quite funny.
David
December 8, 2005 at 9:47 pm
32elendil,
Once, long ago and far away, I knew a Canadian who made one want to do away with all fuel-generated heat if it meant prolonged cuddling.
Cooper,
How long you gonna make us wait?
dee
December 8, 2005 at 10:56 pm
33Forsooth, Cooper! Bushnet is what brought me to this little bit o’cyberspace. Ah, the memories come flooding back…Fanny…the Forum…travelling with Horatio (and how IS that cat, Adam?). Unfortunately, the changeover to WordPress from whatever the hell it was before meant that most of the extraodinarily witty comments were lost.
I think I should have been a historian. I love reading archival material, probably because it reminds me that better and worse days have come and gone.
ice weasel
December 9, 2005 at 3:20 pm
34Hey, can we watch for those liberals in hybrids.
-ice weasel, who drives a Prius
(which, by the way, did fantastic on its’ maiden snow journey this morning)
Melina
December 9, 2005 at 3:57 pm
35Oh Adam, I’d love to hear *your* rendition of “You’re a Mean One, Mr. Grinch”…
From iMBD: A piece of Whoville/Grinchy “trivia”: After the Grinch’s “change of heart”, his pupils change from red to blue…
Hmmmm…
FANtastic post. Thank you!
hedera
December 17, 2005 at 4:28 pm
36The posts seem to have stopped here but I have to say: the rhyme of “unreconstructed” with “fucked it” owes much more to the great Ogden Nash than it does to Dr. Seuss, wonderful as Dr. Seuss was and remains…
David
December 20, 2005 at 1:54 am
37YO, HEDERA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That’s it, just Yo, Hedera. Been wondering when you’d return. Anyone who can legitimately link “fucked it” to Ogden Nash is special.
Pete IVDL
December 20, 2005 at 4:10 am
38Omigosh - welcome back, Hedera! We’ve missed your insights every single darn day. (I know I have, anyway).
How are the knees doing? Are you bending them and stuff yet? Or are you doing the Frankenstein thing? Do let us know all the bits…
hedera
December 21, 2005 at 3:51 pm
39Thanks, Pete and David! I’ve missed you too.
David, I don’t know that Ogden Nash ever actually used “fucked it” in a poem, but he never hesitated to use a 4 letter anglo saxon word if it improved the rhyme; my favorite is the limerick about the Pelican which I will assume you all know. (Do you know the one about the difference between a mandarin waving his hat over his prostrate palanquin bearer, and a mandarin sitting on a block of ice??)
Pete, the entire POINT of rehab after knee replacement is to bend the knee as much as possible, as often as possible, which given the pain level is not as much as I’d like and less often than I’d like. But I now have 110 degrees of flexion in the new knee which all the physical terrorists tell me is excellent for where I am. I’m off the oxycontin but still taking something like 6 vicodin in 24 hours, which is one more than I recall from the last round. Do these things get worse as you get older, or do they just FEEL like they’re worse??
David
December 22, 2005 at 3:20 pm
40I learned the Pelican verse from my now 98-year-old-and-still-kicking-ass father when I was a wee one. It was always the family favorite on the way to the beach in our 39 Chevrolet or my uncle’s Studebaker (Lobster now has that Chevrolet Master Deluxe, and it is his preferred vehicle when not tooling around in Dad’s father’s Maxwell).
Dad is, of course, now on one of the terrorist watch lists, what with his having gone to a Quaker elementary school in Philadelphia, coupled with the fact that he still votes straight Democrat, and knows exactly what he’s doing. I have to fill out the absentee ballot for him because of his advanced macular degeneration, but he still signs his own name, and he still knows a Democrat from a fascist, having fought the bastards in WWII (as an artist making the plywood relief maps the pilots used).
Appointment scheduling service
February 20, 2006 at 2:31 pm
41Hi. I just read your article and i like your work. My wife and I are planning on setting up a website project– it will live on the home page of our site Appointment scheduling service. I am looking for versatility and good information in this field, and I think that you may have the professional skills we are looking for. If you are interested in taking part of the project, I will contact you very soon.
ice age
April 1, 2006 at 10:54 pm
42The first Ice Age had a combination of buddy bonding and a little bit of danger. Remember the Sabre pack constantly harassing Diego and pushing him to get the child? Since we werent sure what he would do we were all rooting for his bond with Manny and Sid to triumph. Less of that here.
In the sequel we are catching up with the trio in some sort of wildlife sanctuary in a valley lined with ice walls. Politics come on early with the mention of global warming leading to the impending melt and the ultimate collapse of the ice walls that hold back enormous amounts of water. So our friends and all the other animals embark on a trek to reach a boat (read giant log) at the far end of the valley in order to save them from the impending flood. Insert Biblical reference here.
As in the first movie, the antagonist here again is the weather. The secondary antagonist (keenly written in the first movie for the Sabre pride) has been reduced to a couple of characterless crocadilian-fish that seem to have a particular taste for migrating mammals. Decent concept, given the flood, but the movie gave them no teeth. I think this is the missing link to making this movie work. Too bad because overall its a pleasing way to spend an hour and a half. Mannies love interest subplot is ok. The concept of Ellie thinking that she is a possum and only realizing that she is in fact a mammoth after she stumbles across the place she was found by her possum mother and the subsequent flashback, makes you thinks that Mannys comment about Ellies …tree not going all the way to the top…, can be applied to the writers.
If nothing else Scrat is reason enough to go see this. He is no longer just an aside as in the first film as he actually gets into the plot here. Albeit, his role in the plot is an overly easy (and early) seque to the films resolution.
Kids will love it. Adults that liked the first one, will be dissapointed.