It’s time, folks. Load up on your favorite intoxicant, invite your friends over, and prepare yourself for what promises to be a stellar State of the Union Address and a tremendously cathartic accompanying Drinking Game. For three years, Fanatical Apathy has been providing you with this fun, unique, and unhealthy coping mechanism.
Once again, I’ve retooled the rules a bit to reflect the changing times. Despite a full-scale war, however, you’ll note that not a lot has changed since last years drink-fest. If there are a couple more opportunities to get thoroughly plastered this year, it’s only because I’m guessing that people’s tolerances might have gone up a bit during the past 12 months of being Driven to Drink by our current administration. With that, I give you:
The State of the Union Drinking Game! (2004 Edition)
The address, as always, will be divided into two parts: “The War On and Around Terrorism” and “The Economy, Stupid.” The rules vary depending on the subject Bush is tackling, so pay attention:
1) The War
- Whenever the President says “evil,” everyone must raise their glass and take a drink. It’s good form to make a brief toast of sorts, something like “Down with evil!” or “Evil is bad!” “Evil” should be pronounced with a soft “i” [”Evihl”].
- Whenever the President utters the phrase “weapons of mass destruction,” everyone drinks. Before downing the drink, however, everyone must affect a cartoony Evil Arab voice and say things like “Quick, hide the weapons!” and “They’ll never find ‘em here!”
- At any point during the War portion of the speech, any player may assume the role of Rogue Nation - exclaiming “Yikes!” and then ducking and cowering. Everyone else must follow suit immediately. The last player to do so becomes the Next Pre-empted Nation, who is then obliged to take a drink.*
- If the President mentions the name “Osama bin Laden,” immediately go to your computer and access a travel website like “Orbitz” or “Travelocity.” Book the new weekend special getaway that will have appeared, a discount ski trip in Hell.
2) The Economy
- Every time the President makes mention of a spending package totaling $1 billion or more, everyone must raise their glass, exclaim “What deficit?” and take a good, hearty sip.
- During the Domestic portion of the speech, keep your eyes peeled. At any time, anyone can choose to silently extend their hand forward, palm up, to receive a Corporate Handout. When you see someone do this, you must do so as well (thus becoming one of “The Rich”). The last person to extend their hand becomes “The Bottom 90%” and must drink, while everyone else yells things like “Who let him in?!” and “Get a job!” and “You’d be pulling your own weight if you didn’t drink so much!”
- Whenever the President makes mention of “tax cuts” or “tax breaks” or “tax relief” (new or old), pump your fist in glee and exclaim “Yes!” Hold the pose. The last person to do this automatically becomes The Future, the living embodiment of generations yet to come. All the other players must then take The Future’s drink and pass it between them, taking large sips. During this, The Future should protest weakly, saying things like “Whoa, easy there,” and “Hey, leave me something, huh?” This continues until The Future’s drink is empty.**
____________________________________________________
*No matter how dangerously drunk the Pre-empted Nation becomes, nobody is permitted to suggest that they be given a break. Anyone who does so immediately becomes “France,” and is obliged to finish their own drink while being ridiculed by the other players.
**Certain more, um, progressive groups of players might want to consider literally screwing The Future for good measure. Because this is just a game rather than our actual reality, however, everyone’s consent is required, including The Future’s.





23 comments
Chicory
January 19, 2004 at 2:53 pm
1So, is anyone having a “State of the Union”party I can attend? Playing the game alone is really depressing. (My husband refuses to drink on a work-night. He’ll just spend his time insulting the TV.)
tess
January 19, 2004 at 3:06 pm
2i’m guessing college poly-sci majors out there are going to get really plastered tonight. since binge-drinking’s gone up (starting just a few years before the bush twins started going to college — probably trying to buck-up their tolerance in anticipation of those 2), and i imagine that a lot of ‘em managed to schedule their tuesdays free, this is just a prime opportunity to get really f***ed up tonight.
thank you mr. president for helping to encourage our young voters to drink, and drink plenty!
tatonka
January 19, 2004 at 3:44 pm
3Starting early and playing late…..
Bob
January 19, 2004 at 3:53 pm
4Or you could keep things simple, and take a drink every time the Prez says something mindbogglingly dumb. Of course, you’d better have the ambulance service on speed-dial.
t.a.
January 19, 2004 at 5:28 pm
5the final rule about screwing The Future simply suggests you invite the right people to the party, with the hope that the very most rightest one becomes the Future and the screwing thereof is pleasant, consentual, and a tribute to american superiority.
tim
January 19, 2004 at 6:20 pm
6How about an Iowa Caucus network coverage drinking game? Every time you hear Dan Rather say something like “close as two possums on a cold prairie night”, everybody drinks. When Aaron Brown tries to supress a smile at some lame Dennis Kucinich joke he that he attempted to steal from from The Daily Show but told wrong, drink twice. When Tom Brokaw tries to say “Council Bluffs, Iowa”, everybody drinks until they start to sound like Tom. Finally, when it turns out that nobody can figure out who won because the whole thing is too complicated, drink everything in the house and go to bed, because the Iowa Caucuses don’t mean a damn thing anyway.
Mike
January 19, 2004 at 6:27 pm
7But I don’t have enough money in my wallet to buy that many cases of beer!
Hilatron
January 19, 2004 at 7:59 pm
8A week ago, I started playing my own drinking game. I take a sip every time I see or read something that makes me think, “Oh, the hell with it, what’s the use, we’re screwed anyway.” I do a shot whenever the state of the world causes my stomach to churn with anxiety. I fully expect to be fired by the end of the week and in a coma by sometime next month, thus avoiding the whole mess.
Sara
January 19, 2004 at 9:42 pm
9Speaking as a college poli-sci major, yes I’m playing, yes I’ll binge if forced to, and thank you, Adam. I was going to email you in desperation if you didn’t post it. Last year the Brown College Democrats did actually play your game (until we ran out of beer!), but this year school is not yet in session, so we’re playing remotely.
Ananna
January 20, 2004 at 2:10 am
10Thank our lucky stars for TiVo!
(No, I have no idea what that means either.)
spiralsands
January 20, 2004 at 8:51 am
11At what point are we to chug the entire can of beer? When he asks for $87 gatrillion zillion more for Iraq? When he talks about increasing military numbers, we should choke on a pretzel.
Tiercel
January 20, 2004 at 10:17 am
12You guys might be amused by someone else’s spin on the idea.
Kiichi Miyazawa
January 20, 2004 at 12:06 pm
13When do we get to barf on a Japanese Prime Minister?
Oh, sorry, I was thinking of the wrong shrub.
disgruntled
January 20, 2004 at 1:37 pm
14One problem with the rules. The phrase “weapons of mass distruction” is on George’s do-not-say list. Mentioning WMD tends to remind people that there ARE NO WMD in Iraq, so that phrase has been conspicuously absent from the Administration’s discourse in the past few months.
I suggest replacing it with “Saddam is a bad man” or (if you want to get really hammered) “freedom”.
adam
January 20, 2004 at 1:50 pm
15Disgruntled - he’ll say it a couple of times, I’d think. In fact, he said it three days ago in reference to Libya:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/01/20040117.html
All told, this version should provide an astute player with a rollicking Wednesday morning headache. But, of course, feel free to work in your own variations.
Chicory
January 20, 2004 at 2:14 pm
16At work, we are dealing with serious budget cuts. The administration is looking at which center/departments are expendable. I’m still weighing the pros and cons of participating in the game with budget meetings the next day
Jeremy
January 20, 2004 at 5:59 pm
17I have never seen such brillance associated with alcohol since the great game of bierut. It’s a great game, even though anyone would probably drink themselves to a coma just listening to the man anyway.
tess
January 20, 2004 at 7:40 pm
18jeremy:
i totally agree. i’ve gotten to the point where listening to him speak causes me to shout the word “whore” over and over until someone nearby has to incapacitate me.
Dave
January 20, 2004 at 9:19 pm
19This is a bloody fantastic idea. Just two comments.
1) I don’t think, even under heavy alcoholic sedation, I could stomach more than 30 seconds of Bush’s smug simian visage and self-righteous blather.
2) How is it possible that lowering tax rates result in the metaphorical bankrupting of “The Future”? It’s a patently stupid notion that government taking less of one’s income makes one poorer. However, since the Bush administration is the biggest spending administration since LBJ, it’s a safe bet that our taxes will be going UP in some fashion to pay for such extravagances as blowing up and rebuilding the Middle East and giving “free” drugs to old geezers on demand. (Gee, I hope when I retire, I can use the state to rip off the generation after me — I’ll need to since I won’t have been to accumulate any retirement money for myself because of all the goddam taxes.)
Other than that, a great game!
Chris
January 20, 2004 at 9:24 pm
20I’m watching it now. The president just said, “Many provisions of the Patriot Act are set to expire next year,” and was about to call for renewal, when scattered applause broke out. Our poor president looked happy for a moment, then confused, and then he realized what they were applauding.
VT Elitist
January 21, 2004 at 9:39 am
21I have a hangover. Damn your game, Adam!
Murray
January 21, 2004 at 4:40 pm
22Dave,
When the adminsitration lowers tax rates (only for the rich) they have less money. You may have more, but the government has less.
When people or governments spend but don’t have the money to pay for it they need to borrow. That means that they will have to pay for it some time in the future. Not only do they have to pay what they spent, they also have to pay the interest on the loan.
Say I like air traffic control, and meat inspections, but I choose to pay for them some time in the next 2 or 3 decades, I’m not poorer now, but my followers (unlikely that I will be paying in 30 years) will have to foot my bill and interest. The longer we spend on credit, the more and longer the payback will be.
The other problem is that we are relying on foreign investors to keep us propped up. If we continue to spend like a drunken sailor doing the SOTU drinking game, other countries will treat us like the deadbeats we are and pull the plug. If that happens I guarantee you we will all be a lot poorer.
Adam
I wish that I had read this post before I listened to the unelected, occupier of the white house. I might have lasted longer.
That is what is so great about this site, it allows me to laugh at the horror and not cry in the corner
Alex
February 12, 2004 at 12:21 pm
23Where’s the drinking requirement for use of the phrases “shadowy networks” and “danger/dangerous man/madman”? Surely, we can be applying ourselves a little more and getting a lot drunker.